You can customize your world extensively, e.g.It is very satisfying when you finally manage to survive a full year!.However, “Don’t Starve Together” is one of the few good survival games with couch co-op support, and (as we all know) surviving in a harsh world is a lot better when you have a friend around. The combat system is a bit weird, which somestimes makes it hard to deal with randomily appearing boss monsters. “Don’t Starve Together” is a challenging survival game with an excellent art style and a lot of interesting places to explore. If you want a more relaxed experience, the game includes a lot of settings to customize your world and lower the difficulty. No matter what season it is, you’re constantly on the move to collect food and resources, which can be little bit stressful at times. For example, food is scarce in winter and you need to protect your character from the cold. Each of them is challenging for its own reason. The game includes all seasons of the year. If you don’t have a light source near you, strange creatures will find and kill you at night. If you manage to gather enough resources, you can build a formidable camp with cooking pots, farms and even a fridge. Explore the region, cut down trees, craft a campfire and, well, don’t starve. “Don’t Starve Together” throws you and one additional friend inside a randomly generated world. This isn't a8out "who got the 8est end of the deal" or "who's the more hardcore starver", its a8out joining two communities to 8enefit the motives of each company as equally as possi8le.Enter an unexplored world full of strange creatures, gather resources and craft items for survival. Technically, in paying for the magazine (or whatever the heck it is), they are also advertadley (in a sort of rounda8out kind of way) paying for the game, and supporting the developers. Klei gets their game advertised to a possi8ly completely different type of audience, and Sony advertise their magazine (or whatever) with free merchandise. The point is, 8oth sides 8enefit from this agreement. Perhaps they agreed to advertise the game exclusively, 8y advertising it in the ps plus, 8ut thats not the point. Perhaps Sony payed a reasona8le amount of money to klei to let them hand it out for free (which they would inedita8lly make 8ack from the customers costs of owning ps plus).
Klei must have given sony permission to hand out their game, which means some sort of agreement must have 8een reached. I don't really see what the pro8lems a8out.
0 kommentar(er)
